Dedicated To The Smallest Of Skiffs banner

Tunnel Hull- Vented Vs. Non Vented

37K views 36 replies 14 participants last post by  jlowens2968  
#1 ·
Im looking into my next boat to be a tunnel hull however i have came across the non vented vs vented hull. Can anyone explain the major difference in one another and which one is perfered this boat will be used in SW Florida. Im looking for a boat to float but also run very shallow as possible with a normal outboard.
I currently have a 16ft action craft with a 115hp with jackplate that i believe runs in 10" of water maybe shallower. Will i be amazed in the other shallow running boats out there compared to mine or is it a minor difference in the draft while running.

Thanks
 
#2 ·
Vented hull is intended to break the vacuum created in the tunnel
by the forward motion of the hull. Venting cuts the drag, increases speed.
Non vented tunnel is usually designed to funnel and squeeze water
into a narrowing tunnel to direct the flow of water to the prop and water intake.
both designs will be slower than a normal hull due to increased wetted surface.

https://picasaweb.google.com/bdefalco/PocketTunnel


Running draft of a standard planing hull can be roughly calculated by measuring
the poling draft of the hull when fully loaded, then adding the distance from
the top of the water inlet to the bottom of the skeg or propeller tips.
Anything less than that distance and the lower unit and prop are chewing bottom.
The tunnel raises the level of the water above the bottom of the transom
when on plane, and so allows the water inlet to be raised up an equal amount.
 
#3 ·
Well I'm just curious if one or the other is going to be a huge benefit or not. I heard tunnels run shallower and that's what I'm looking for. Will I be able to drastically run shallower with a tunnel vs my 16ft action craft with jackplate. Also I've been looking into the sterling tr 7 I was told draft is 5-6 and runs in 2.5-5 inches if water. Is that possible. I'm looking for a boat 16-18ft with a beam top beam in the 80's wider the better. With a decent sized engine so I can run in the mid 30's. It will be used in south west Florida pine island, gasprilla sound areas.
 
#4 ·
I'm not much for believing advertising claims or sales pitches.
If you find a boat that interests you, go for a test ride.
Do it on a nasty day someplace where there's some extreme shallows
so you can see for yourself how it rides in slop and how shallow it'll run.
Quick way to tell if a boat can really run in 6 inches
is to look at how much paint has been dragged off the lower unit,
how chewed up the underside of the hull is and how dinged up the prop is.

The shallowest I'll run my tunnel is about 12 inches.
Any less and the skeg starts dragging, the prop starts getting dings.
You can see the top of the tunnel and level bubble
and the bottom of the hull and water intake.

Image


If extreme shallow is what you need, then a tunnel jet is your solution.

Image


Image
 
#5 ·
Well I'm just curious if one or the other is going to be a huge benefit or not. I heard tunnels run shallower and that's what I'm looking for. Will I be able to drastically run shallower with a tunnel vs my 16ft action craft with jackplate. Also I've been looking into the sterling tr 7 I was told draft is 5-6 and runs in 2.5-5 inches if water. Is that possible. I'm looking for a boat 16-18ft with a beam top beam in the 80's wider the better. With a decent sized engine so I can run in the mid 30's. It will be used in south west Florida pine island, gasprilla sound areas.

Not going to happen my friend, it will run in about 7"-8" at the very least, but it needs every bit of 9" to float at least with a 90hp and top speed is about 32mph. How do I know cause I fish one reguarly with a friend, it's also a very wet boat.

Oh and at that running depth yes we are chewing on the bottom. Better hope there isn't something hard under there.
 
#6 ·
Well if you consider dragging the bottom and the prop sub soil but still moving, running. Then it will do it.
Typically running in 2.5" is BS.

Use some common sense here, how well will a prop work if it is more than half out of the water if it is not a true surface piercing prop. Lets say a boat will run completely on top of the water (0" draft) and you had 8" tall tunnel, with a 15" prop typically about 1" above that to cav plate and 1" below that to bottom of skeg so 17" total that leaves the prop about half out of the water.

Just curious how come you think your AC will run in 10"? Not trying to crack on you or your boat, just have heard same or less running depths only to really investigate and find out that the water was really deeper than the person thought.
 
#7 ·
Well if you consider dragging the bottom and the prop sub soil but still moving, running. Then it will do it.
Typically running in 2.5" is BS.

Use some common sense here, how well will a prop work if it is more than half out of the water if it is not a true surface piercing prop. Lets say a boat will run completely on top of the water (0" draft) and you had 8" tall tunnel, with a 15" prop typically about 1" above that to cav plate and 1" below that to bottom of skeg so 17" total that leaves the prop about half out of the water.

Just curious how come you think your AC will run in 10"? Not trying to crack on you or your boat, just have heard same or less running depths only to really investigate and find out that the water was really deeper than the person thought.
Yep!

A Jet Ski won't even run in that, how do I know cause I watched my friend while out ridding our skis try to cut through a little flat that still had water on it, but guess what he only made it about half way and the water was about 4" deep. I have a picture somewhere of it.
 
#10 ·
Brett, I appreciate your workmanship and the info you posted here but, you should be able to run that motor much higher with your tunnel than your pictures suggest. Not an insult , more of a question. I have a non tunnel with the motor way higher than you are running. My last boat was a tunnel but did not run so well, just shallow.
 
#11 ·
This pic, is of a 5 hp Nissan with a stock 9x8 prop on it.

Image


Had to be that low because the prop didn't have enough cup to deal with the aerated water.

A later setup was with a 9.9 merc with a cupped prop that let me put the anti-ventilation plate
level with the top of the pocket tunnel. And the 9.9 does make her get up and go.  ;)

Image


Image
 
#13 ·
Well I'm just curious if one or the other is going to be a huge benefit or not. I heard tunnels run shallower and that's what I'm looking for. Will I be able to drastically run shallower with a tunnel vs my 16ft action craft with jackplate. Also I've been looking into the sterling tr 7 I was told draft is 5-6 and runs in 2.5-5 inches if water. Is that possible. I'm looking for a boat 16-18ft with a beam top beam in the 80's wider the better. With a decent sized engine so I can run in the mid 30's. It will be used in south west Florida pine island, gasprilla sound areas.

Not going to happen my friend, it will run in about 7"-8" at the very least, but it needs every bit of 9" to float at least with a 90hp and top speed is about 32mph. How do I know cause I fish one reguarly with a friend, it's also a very wet boat.

Oh and at that running depth yes we are chewing on the bottom. Better hope there isn't something hard under there.
ok well what other boats out there in that size range will run as shallow or shallower and float the same or shallower just curious to see what my options are. I want a pratical flats boat but that will run some serious shallow water.
 
#14 ·
Well if you consider dragging the bottom and the prop sub soil but still moving, running. Then it will do it.
Typically running in 2.5" is BS.

Use some common sense here, how well will a prop work if it is more than half out of the water if it is not a true surface piercing prop. Lets say a boat will run completely on top of the water (0" draft) and you had 8" tall tunnel, with a 15" prop typically about 1" above that to cav plate and 1" below that to bottom of skeg so 17" total that leaves the prop about half out of the water.

Just curious how come you think your AC will run in 10"? Not trying to crack on you or your boat, just have heard same or less running depths only to really investigate and find out that the water was really deeper than the person thought.
I dont know how shallow it really will run i know i have drafted and measured 12" and ran across the same water so 12" i do believe it will run over. I may be wrong however Im still looking for a boat to run as shallow as possible if I do need it.
 
#17 ·
I fish out of a buddies HPX-T a few times a year. I keep telling him if it ever "disappears" to check my place first, fair warning and all that. I was out last Friday with him. We always end up going through water that makes me look for the best ejection path out of the boat because I just know we are going to run hard aground. It never happens and I always look back and see clean water behind us when I expect to see grass and mud. I know we are running 8" probably closer to 6" in small patches. All that can be deceptive though and I usually don't jump out while we are on plane with a ruler. He knows his boat and has never had an issue. It would take a while to get used to doing that if I was behind the wheel. Honestly I would not run a boat over grass intentionally in less that 8", you know it will give the grass a hair cut even if you don't leave scars in the bottom. And yes it will not float as shallow as it runs nor will it get on plane in water it can still run in. I can tell you with certainty it is one very shallow running boat it runs in nothing but that mythical spit.
 
#18 ·
I fish out of a buddies HPX-T a few times a year.  I keep telling him if it ever "disappears" to check my place first, fair warning and all that.  I was out last Friday with him.  We always end up going through water that makes me look for the best ejection path out of the boat because I just know we are going to run hard aground.  It never happens and I always look back and see clean water behind us when I expect to see grass and mud.  I know we are running 8" probably closer to 6" in small patches.  All that can be deceptive though and I usually don't jump out while we are on plane with a ruler.  He knows his boat and has never had an issue.  It would take a while to get used to doing that if I was behind the wheel.  Honestly I would not run a boat over grass intentionally in less that 8", you know it will give the grass a hair cut even if you don't leave scars in the bottom.  And yes it will not float as shallow as it runs nor will it get on plane in water it can still run in.  I can tell you with certainty it is one very shallow running boat it runs in nothing but that mythical spit. 
Thanks for the info I see your also from SW florida. Where at in Sw Florida
 
#19 ·
i cant speak for the TR-7 but the hpx-t drafts much more than it runs in. the skiff runs in spit... saying this just based off a couple experiences
In your real life experiences what in real world depth do you believe the HPX-T really runs in and drafts real world numbers if you can recall.
realistic numbers I would say runs in 6" more or Less... draft is closer to the 8" mark than the advertised 5" or so.
 
#22 ·
The right tunnel (set up right) will run with the skeg above the bottom of the boat. Even at that, 2.5" (hard bottom) is a stretch. This is how my 17T will run all day and maintain water pressure. Just this last weekend, I ran 1/4 mile across a rock hard bottom flat that was 6" deep. That's about the limit over hard bottom (soft bottom is a whole different story) that I will push it to. The shallower it gets, the more lift you get from compressing the water under the boat and I'm sure my boat would skim along in 2" of water. The only problem is, at that depth you don't have enough water to fill the tunnel, the tunnel loses its suction and you lose grip and water pressure.

Image
 
#25 ·
I know this is my first post but I've been a regular lurker for years now. I felt the need to create a profile so that I could chime in on the TR7. I was finally in the position to pull the trigger on a nice boat and I went with a 2008 TR7 with a 90 Yami 2 stroke. For anyone who lives in the Titusville area it was the blue one at BT's marine.

Since I have never had a nice boat with all the bells and whistles before like this one. I can't stand here and say that it does "this" better than "that" boat. But I can say that it does every thing I've asked it to do and more.

I bought it from a captain who had 3 of them in the family which one of the boats was actually one of the first few hulls to come out of production. After a while of tweaking the prop set up (5 times) they came up with a custom double cup prop from bauman that really let's this boat do what it was supposed to do from the design concept.

In all I think you would be happy with this boat if you we're to ride in one that had the proper set up. But by all means like every one else has said put eyes on and ride in other boats and the right one will be a clear choice.
 
#26 ·
Cav Plate, Jack-Plate, Heavy Cupped Prop, Water Pressure Gauge, and are all needed for sure and IMHO i'm a fan of the vented prop as it gives more speed and better hole-shot than a non vented tunnel. We've also done some cool stuff with our tunnel design to feed more water and at a higher level than currently offered...
I'll have Video/Pics coming on it as our TX Version were offering has this and I'm building myself a Lostmen and we have a Fury getting it's first tunnel now as well...
If you want a ride I'd be happy to show anybody the plus and minus of a tunnel and what our boats can do as well...
tight lines and good read/thread.
Kevin