Dedicated To The Smallest Of Skiffs banner

Sage Z-Axis 8# From 2010…Replace or Keep

2.6K views 30 replies 24 participants last post by  snookchaser42  
#1 ·
Just moved back to the Lowcountry north of Charleston. Developed a passion for fly fishing while in Idaho for a couple years. Just bought a Mitzi Tournament 17 and I’m anxious to pound the Wando.

In 2010 I bought an 8# 9’ Sage Z-Axis and Nautilus reel for a bone fishing trip to Belize. The weather sucked and we never fished. I still have the rig never used. Here’s my question…

Do you guys think a 2010 Sage Z-Axis is still a viable and effective rod for creeks and flood tides in my area? I’d love to save some money if you guys believe the rod is still solid and a good fit the area.
 
#3 ·
The Sage Z Axis rods have a cult like following for a reason. Never fished where you are, but I’d offer this: if you can’t catch fish with that rod don’t think you’re going to catch fish with a newer rod either. I still have my Z Axis 5 wt and it is a fabulous rod. That rod has the most precise ferrule fit of any rod I’ve ever owned, I mean it’s actually mind blowing how precise the pieces fit together. It’s like someone spent hours hand fitting the ferrules. In other words, the rod was built with great care. As good as my 5 wt is I can’t imagine your 8 wt is a dog.

How does it cast for you? You must have liked it back in 2010 or I imagine you wouldn’t have bought it, the rod didn’t start sucking in the meantime.

Maybe you just want a new rod, that’s cool. Since your current rod is essentially new I’m sure you could sell it quite easily to a Z Axis fan for top dollar.
 
#5 ·
z axis is as good as all but the very top modern rods in my opinion. I still use my z-axis 5wt for trout. I see no reason to replace it. I feel like sage hit their peak with tapers about that time... since then materials have gotten slightly better... maybe 5%... if its not broken dont replace it.... unless you just dont like the feel of the way it casts.
 
#8 ·
Thanks guys. I was just worried about the age and have never used it. Looks like I just saved $1,000. I bought some fresh line at Haddrells Fin and Fealther Thurs. I’ll practice casting the old girl today off my dock.

This is a big change from drifting and wading the Henry’s Fork and South Fork of the Snake River with dry flies and indicators. I bought a tide book, loaded the app, and have caught several reds and trout from my neighbor’s bay boat since moving back. I’m learning the area quickly.

My skiff is being rigged at Cape Romain Marine and won’t be ready until the 22nd, so I have time to adjust to shooting heavier line.
 
#12 ·
Count yourself lucky to have a NOS Z-Axis. It has a nice moderately fast action and is easy to cast. Very similar to a Loomis GLX, which can still be purchased new. The big difference is Sage's marketing strategy of constantly discontinuing models to attract buyers to the latest and supposedly greatest. There are several top-end rods available now that are marginally better, but you would need to be an astute caster to notice the difference. Fish it and enjoy it!
 
#15 ·
I would for sure fish the hell out of that rod. Why? firstly, because it's "free" since you already have it. second, the likelihood of you actually having a better experience that is truly attributable to the rod vs. your own abilities is relatively minimal. Have there been "advances" in technology since that rod was made? Sure, I guess. Do they make it worth dropping a thousand dollars to replace a functional piece of equipment? Not to me!

When I first was getting into fly fishing I went and got a TFO rod and practiced and practiced and... you get the idea. I went with my dad to a club meeting down in Naples where we heard all about tarpon fishing and then spent the next hour or two with some casting instructors. At some point I told my dad I wanted to get a different rod cause I was feeling like I needed something "better". Having never cast the TFO before, he took it from me, made two test casts, then pulled out the entire line and landed at his friend's feet 100 feet away. "So what's wrong with this?" Of course I went on to spend thousands on new rods anyway, accomplishing nothing more than what I'm now sure I could have with that TFO. The point is it's not the rod that makes the biggest difference. It's the skill of the caster. Enjoy that sage.
 
#16 ·
It’s the archer not the arrow. Nothing wrong with a z-axis. In 6 years the only new rods I have bought are 8 ,9 , both Scott tidals and the Winston 10.Except for those 3,in 20 years,bought off the used rack. Being a life long shop rat and casting different rods,when someone goes to latest one,I get the old one. The fish don’t care what rod caught it.
 
#18 ·
Put on the new line and did about 30 minutes of double-haul casting off the dock this evening. I surprised myself. 😁 Only one wind knot, and in a stiff breeze too. In two days I’ll be shooting line halfway across the Wando. I really like it. The backing looked brand new. I left it.

So funny. 24 hours ago I considered it might be too old to use and a mediocre rod to begin with. One post later and I realize my hoarding an unused rod was like finding a low mileage 356 Porsche in my grandpa’s barn. I’ll put the $1,000 saved into a grab rail and casting platform.
 
#23 ·
As long as were praising Sage; I've got a 9', 5 wt, 2 pc Light Line from 1988! It was and still is my favorite rod. Age has done nothing to diminish it's feel and action. It could use a little cleaning up but I wouldn't give it up for any other rod. If I were you, I'd fish the Sage knowing you could not do much better for any amount of money. Enjoy.
 
#30 ·
I’m actually liking the feel of the older rods. Probably my inexperience, actually pretty sure it’s my inexperience older rods just have more feel for me. Easier for me to load them!
I came to fly fishing when the RPL series was state-of-the-art; and they're still the gold standard for me.

I came for the recipes, generally let down.
took me a while, but I finally got it.....