Dedicated To The Smallest Of Skiffs banner

GPS inshore LA

8.7K views 31 replies 14 participants last post by  DBStoots  
#1 ·
I have done extensive search on here researching which GPS to get with my ordered Sabine Versatile. There is good advise for fishing larger bays and for Florida in general.

Any recommendations for best unit for SW Louisiana and occasionally back to coastal SC.

Looking for 7 or 9 inch
detailed mapping/navigation is most important factor
sideview/downview would be secondary
fishfinder would be a plus but little importance

Looking currently at Simrad and Lowrance for option to get the Louisiana Marine tracker chip but man are those chips expensive and not 100% I will ever get one.

Recommendations?
 
#2 ·
Simrad or Lowrance give the most options of maps you can choose. In La I think land moves a bunch so most of the maps I’ve seen have not been accurate. I use the La marine track and it’s a decent map but there are many tracks around Houma and Venice that literally run into dry land.
 
#5 ·
A good, much less expensive option for a map chip for Louisiana is Standard Mappings Louisiana One Card satellite imagery. You can get it for Simrad/Lowrance and for Garmin.
 
#6 ·
Standard mapping is decent, but I'm not a fan. I dont' like their cartoony blue background, the resolution isn't great, and the imagery is 5 years old. It is still better than any base map that will come standard with your GPS, and its good enough to get you around most of LA safely...esp SW LA. There's not much to it over there and changes to the marsh aren't as drastic as other areas like Venice. When SM first came out it was groundbreaking for LA fisherman...now, its a bit of old dinosaur.

Please stay away from Strikelines mapping. I bought their chip when it was on sale for Black friday.

Here's my cons list for Strikelines 4k SELA:

No landmark names (bayous, bays etc)
Extremely outdated imagery (10+ years old)
Cuts off some barrier islands
Imagery cuts off close to shore (missing sandbars and other features in bays and off the coast)
Imagery was taken during high / dirty water period so can't see underwater features in most places.

Really curious how Isla Mapping looks, but don't want to pay the price tag to find out.
 
#7 ·
What Tide said!! Mirrors my experience with SM and Stirkelines.

As for Isla Mapping, I gave up on them. They were supposed to have an updated LA card out last fall. Then by the end of the year. Well that ships come and gone 4 months ago. Yet they continue to put out updates in FL. I get that FL is their bread and butter, as it should be. But its also clear that any LA work is an afterthought.
 
#9 ·
LA is no afterthought at ISLA. It is a ridiculous statement to make and you should retract it as it was made out of ignorance. If you have given up on ISLA and are unhappy with your product or the speed with which new images are provided are we are happy to refund all of your purchase cost and remove you from our data base if you return your chips. Just send us an email letting us know and we will get it done.

You really have no idea what goes on at ISLA, how the work gets done, or what is really involved in creating the files for the charts and particularly image files. Updates for map vector features are totally different from updates to images. The two are mutually exclusive and are produced and created separately. Map lines and points and features can be changed and ready to go in a day or less and those updates go on every week all over the place. We are changing and releasing map vector features weekly. We will be updating the St. Marks area with further details on Monday and Tuesday for instance. The maps that are sold one week are routinely slightly different from the maps sold the next week because of these vector updates. It could be a moved set of markers, some stakes, a new bar highlighted, a new Poll and Troll area, a broken or moved daymarker or moved buoy etc. As another current example, we just got word of a new large sandbar that has formed in the St. Johns river that could be a navigation issue. We are looking into that now and if it is true, it will be reflected on the charts that are sold within a few days of us confirming it and we will likely send out an email about it as well if it is substantive.

There have been no imagery updates in FL since last fall and LA imagery has been in the works since then. Fixing images so they appear correctly and are bright and clear and seamless is extremely time consuming. LA is particularly challenging. ISLA is updating the entire database of images for LA. Every photo is from an airplane and adjusted by hand and many of the images are very hi resolution at 3 and 6 inches and are proprietary. Fixing the problems such as sun glare, brightness, contrast, color etc., that are always inherent in aerial images encompassing hundreds of square miles is a major undertaking and can take a very long time. Many of the images are more challenging to work with in LA and the number of different data sets is larger as well. There is no short cut to producing what we do. It's all done by hand and on the water.

We don't skimp on quality and work to put out the best imagery. We would like to be able to get it all out immediately, but there is no shortcut to it and trying to create one would result in something similar to what people complain about every day on other charts. There is a good reason the others get so many complaints about their image quality and accuracy and have the reputation they rightfully earned. It is very hard to do what we do here and because of economics and scaling efficiency, they will likely never produce any images that are close to our standard; it is not an efficient business model given the current technology. But here, the economics and efficiency is not what drives us. It's not about money here and it never was right from the beginning. It was about fixing the problems. ISLA was born out of frustration with the other charts that fail so miserably but it was never originally conceived to be a product for sale. It just grew into that by word of mouth after the first charts were created that fixed the problems years ago. ISLA has grown to the business it is and has the reputation it has because we do things very differently from the other guys.

We have come a long way on this image update project for LA and hope it will be released this summer. We apologize for your frustration. If it was possible without cutting quality, it would have been out early this year but the datasets of images have proven to be more challenging to process than originally anticipated and we don't want to cut quality on appearance or resolution.
 
#8 ·
Stick with Simrad or Lowrance so you can use StandardMapping chips. If I read all the other comments correctly there wasn’t another glowing recommendation. SM is plenty good and necessary for LA. The resolution and goofy blue background is a compromise for contrast in the bright sun. Other chips I’ve seen may have better details in certain spots but may be too dark in areas you need better contrast (Navionics sux) and water and land are all green/brown. SM contrast just works.

I do not rely on my GPS map for discovering locations to fish, you need to do that on Google Earth ahead of a trip and on a large home computer monitor and upload points to the GPS. If I need to discover a new spot, SM will work in a pinch, but the marsh is constantly changing, so expect differences with any satellite overlay.

I use an older NSS9” Simrad and love the combo of a zoom rolling dial and touch screen. I bought mine off EBay for $600 in new box.
 
#10 ·
I don't have any Isla Marine products. I am not frustrated with your products. I am quite frustrated with your sales pitch. Its understandable it takes time to process all the data and to do a quality job. But dont put out information saying you hope to have it out by the end of the year. Then when its not done and I enquire I get "we are working it." Then two days ago I asked again. And I get a one sentence reply saying "we are working it" Too busy to even say sorry for the delay and we hope to have it out this summer. Instead of you then having to reply with an entire page. A simple update on facebook or here or your website shouldn't be too much to ask. The issue is guys that would like to consider your product need a realistic projection on when it would be available so they can decide to wait or buy a different product. Which is what I ended up doing.