Joined
·
181 Posts
Hard to compare the two since they were on different skiffs/motors/props. Both worked well and improved performance in a number of ways. (Better holeshot, better water pressure, eliminated cavitation regardless of jack plate setting, slower minimum planing speed, allowed me to jump up and run with the JP maxed-out).
Both have their positives and negatives. The Tran requires drilling, the Shaw might move and cause wear on the lower-unit if not installed properly. One might hit the sponsons. The Tran is easier to customize if needed. Shaw comes in 3 sizes (I think...?). The Tran is cheaper...etc...etc. Personal preference and looks might come into play too.
In my case, BOTH plates dramatically improved performance and made my skiffs much more capable on the water. That opened up more fishing opportunities that were not available before. If needed, the right prop, plate and engine setting can make a big difference if you want to maximize a skiff's ability to (responsibly) get up and run in shallow water.
Both have their positives and negatives. The Tran requires drilling, the Shaw might move and cause wear on the lower-unit if not installed properly. One might hit the sponsons. The Tran is easier to customize if needed. Shaw comes in 3 sizes (I think...?). The Tran is cheaper...etc...etc. Personal preference and looks might come into play too.
In my case, BOTH plates dramatically improved performance and made my skiffs much more capable on the water. That opened up more fishing opportunities that were not available before. If needed, the right prop, plate and engine setting can make a big difference if you want to maximize a skiff's ability to (responsibly) get up and run in shallow water.