21 or 22 is the sweet spot. Not longer unless you tarpon fish a lot.Ok before I get all the rule of thumb "3ft longer than your boat" responses, I know the rule of thumb. What I am looking for are folks that are going longer. My sled is 16 and change and am wondering, as I am starting to look for a new pole, if there is any advantage to exceeding the 3ft rule of thumb. Is 19 just right? Would 21 or 23 be absurd? What are the advantages/drawbacks of being too long? Having pole that's too long is something I have zero life experience with...![]()
Zika nailed it - longer is better when you are poling - the problem is getting to that spot. Get a 24' pole, and you just turned your 16' boat into a 24' boat, which may be fine, but does require more consideration when trailering, turning, launching, and manuevering. There's nothing worse than the sound of a 24' pole catapulting out of your push pole holders at any speed, or the ugly "twang" of it catching on a piling at the ramp as you execute a tight turn..21 would be the max I'd do, 20 would be better. Yes, longer is an advantage when poling deeper water. or soft bottom. But for me, the trade-off in dealing with docks/ramps, trailering, running and storage just isn't worth it.
Better to have too much than not enough.Ask a woman and you’ll get your real answer…
You beat me to it.If you are fishing hard sand bottom in 2 feet and under you might be able to get away with a 20 or 21. The length of the boat doesn't matter nearly as much as the height of the platform. You can always shorten a push pole and it will look like it came that way, not so with adding length.